Unit of Competency Mapping – Information for Teachers/Assessors – Information for Learners
PMAOMIR622 Mapping and Delivery Guide
Build partnerships to improve incident response capacity
Version 1.0
Issue Date: May 2024
Qualification | - |
Unit of Competency | PMAOMIR622 - Build partnerships to improve incident response capacity |
---|---|---|---|
Description | |||
Employability Skills | |||
Learning Outcomes and Application | This unit of competency covers the skills and knowledge required to leverage partnerships to improve the organisation's capabilities to respond to incidents.An incident is an event which causes, or could have caused, injury or illness; damage to plant, material or the environment; disruption to production or public alarm.An incident is an unintended event, or an unintended consequence of an intended event, such as: fire and explosionloss of containmentexcursions above/below acceptable limits for emissions or plant conditionsexcursions above occupational hygiene or biological exposure limitsnon-compliance with regulatory requirementssecurity breachesfailure to follow procedurescomplaintsvehicle incidentson/off-site incidents.This unit of competency applies to senior managers, crisis team managers or those in similar roles who are required to initiate and manage external relationships for joint/cooperative efforts towards incident response and plan, coordinate and evaluate activities with the partners.Generally, the person would be a member of senior management and a member of the crisis management team. Although independent action may be required, he/she will be expected to coordinate, liaise and consult with other members of the team and other appropriate personnel.No licensing, legislative or certification requirements apply to this unit at the time of publication. | ||
Duration and Setting | X weeks, nominally xx hours, delivered in a classroom/online/blended learning setting. The unit should be assessed holistically and the judgement of competence based on a holistic assessment of the evidence. The collection of performance evidence is best done from a report and/or folio of evidence drawn from: a single project/case study which provides sufficient evidence of the requirements of all the elements and performance criteria multiple smaller projects/case studies which together provide sufficient evidence of the requirements of all the elements and performance criteria. A third-party report, or similar, may be needed to testify to the work done by the individual, particularly when the project has been done as part of a project team. Assessment should use a real project/case study in an operational workplace. Where this is not possible or practical, assessment must occur using a sufficiently rigorous simulated environment reflecting realistic operational workplace conditions. This must cover all aspects of workplace performance, including environment, task skills, task management skills, contingency management skills and job role environment skills Knowledge evidence may be collected concurrently with performance evidence (provided a record is kept) or through an independent process, such as workbooks, written assessments or interviews (provided a record is kept). Assessment processes and techniques must be appropriate to the language, literacy and numeracy requirements of the work being performed and the needs of the candidate. Conditions for assessment must include access to all tools, equipment, materials and documentation required, including relevant workplace procedures, product and manufacturing specifications associated with this unit. Foundation skills are integral to competent performance of the unit and should not be assessed separately. Assessors must satisfy the assessor competency requirements that are in place at the time of the assessment as set by the VET regulator. In addition, the assessor or anyone acting in subject matter expert role in assessment must demonstrate both technical competency and currency. If the assessor cannot demonstrate technical competency and currency they must assess with a subject matter expert who does meet these requirements. Technical competence can be demonstrated through one or more of: relevant VET or other qualification/Statement of Attainment appropriate workplace experience undertaking the type of work being assessed under routine and non-routine conditions appropriate workplace experience supervising/evaluating the type of work being assessed under routine and non-routine conditions Currency can be demonstrated through one or more of: being currently employed undertaking the type of work being assessed being employed by the organisation undertaking the type of work being assessed and having maintained currency in accordance with that organisation’s policies and procedures having consulted/had contact with an organisation undertaking the type of work being assessed within the last twelve months, the consultation/contact being related to assessment conducting on-the-job training/assessments of the type of work being assessed being an active member of a relevant professional body and participating in activities relevant to the assessment of this type of work |
||
Prerequisites/co-requisites | |||
Competency Field | Incident readiness and response |
Development and validation strategy and guide for assessors and learners | Student Learning Resources | Handouts Activities |
Slides PPT |
Assessment 1 | Assessment 2 | Assessment 3 | Assessment 4 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Elements of Competency | Performance Criteria | |||||||
Element: Identify opportunities for specific partnerships |
| |||||||
Element: Develop a framework for the partnership |
| |||||||
Element: Manage the relationship in order to enhance incident response |
| |||||||
Element: Rebuild partnerships after an incident/exercise |
| |||||||
Element: Evaluate the effectiveness of the partnership |
|